Canvas not supported

2023-10-26 : Pls CLICK HERE to DOWNLOAD a WebsiteCopy=(not re-included) Unzip & then click on file named "index.html" , to explore this One24thOutOfPhase info OFFLINE on your DESKTOP PC with your Default Brouwser.

26 October 2023 = 587.87MB : Changed the - Website Copy to use offline - Above, to reflect new Motion / Quantum entanglement Stuff added previously to this Website.

email =  m.junkyardinnovations@gmail.com

08-02-2023 Updated ! Also see https://junkyardinnovations.info/EB-CoreCodeblock.html for Math Page

See the:- One24thOutOfPhase & EbMec40 videos below the Black Swan !

 

A Collapsible & Pivoted 

SQUARE 

Connected to a 

CIRCLE 

acting as a Crank,

when Rotated then lead to the 

One24thOUTofPHASE 

Discovery

at the 

SQUARES 

2 Free ENDS.

This MECHANICAL hardwired PRINCIPLE 

lead to all sort of interesting possibilties. 

Please read on....


30May2022=The above is what the below *.bas & *.exe display!

ONE24outofphase_prelimFreeBasic.bas

ONE24outofphase_prelimFreeBasic.exe

Get ONE24outofphase_prelimFreeBasic.bas!

or/& Get ONE24outofphase_prelimFreeBasic.exe!

 

 

 

 

31 May 2021 A0 page : Slightly adjusted Below

30may2021-1_24th.dgn

30may2021-1_24th.dwg

30may2021-1_24th.pdf

30may2021-1_24th.dxf

Some Stuff ( eb as applied in a Basic Frame ) below...uploaded on 01-22-2021


0000_eb-basicFrame_3D_iam.dwg

0000_eb-basicFrame_3D_iam.dxf

0000_eb-basicFrame_3D_iam.dgn


 SEE SOME MOSTLY  REPACKAGED STUFF BELOW BETWEEN THE LINES 


17oct2019-1_24th.dgn

17oct2019-1_24th.dwg

17oct2019-1_24th.pdf

17oct2019-1_24th.svg


 

 

iam=ImaginaryAtomicModel-or-gates_theory(AN-UNFINISHED-WORK).pdf 

17feb2017_Twinesine_New_Explanation_01-09.pdf

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_1of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_2of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_3of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_4of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_5of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_6of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_7of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_8of9.svg

17feb2017_Twinesine_NEW_Explanation_9of9.svg

one24outofphase2019july24.pdf

one24outofphase2019july24.svg

Index of all files : enter in searchbar of brouwser : junkyardinnovations.info

1st published on  the 17th 

of   February

 in the year 

2010 

by  

m  

Updated on 22January2021

 

NEW” DISCOVERY  OF  VARIABLE COMPLEX  

 

“TWINE WAVES SHAPES” 

 RELATED TO SINE WAVES.

Autoplay Speed:
To StartPrevious ImageAutoPlayNext ImageTo End

0

INTRODUCTION.

    To one who is a "severe amateur" dabbler in Mathematics, such as myself, it does appear that 

some of the professional interest has somewhat become concentrated on the 

abstract investigation of Mathematics, especially related to the science of 

Physics theory and also hard to understand Mathematical Theorems  

and     the      laborious      proof      thereof.

1

 

 Hard to me, that is ;- being accustomed to suck from the lesser teat mathematically speaking  { : <

 This observation then not being a criticism of the professionals but rather a 'grudging'  acknowledgment of 
the fact that the human mind need to  move on from the  so called "elementary knowledge", referring 
here to our understanding of the qualities of those 'Geometry Basics' ;-

  we may have come to take for granted ;

 

- these basics being the Circle, the Square and the Triangle.
 
2
 
So why then acknowledge “the need to move on ”?.

Only so as to call attention to this humble observation;- that sometimes that natural drive “to move on”, 

can cause us to miss or overlook something , yes maybe just a mundane thing and of no 'immediate' great value.

Yet in this case, of Twine Wave Shapes, it is proposed that Something of 

a Profoundly important nature;- Relating to the relationship between a Circle and a Square 

   and to some extent the Triangle has been 'left undiscovered', that is up to now ;- 

    Uncovered by a act of mere stumbling upon, admittedly.

3

' Left undiscovered ', you may frown ...} : ?
 

 The reason for that statement is because there has been a coming to it very close;- to this suggested profound discovery,
 in years past, in the form of the well known, late year 18 hundreds, Peaucellier-Lipkin Linkage,-
and later in the 19 hundreds, of Chaos theory as it relate to a Circle's properties.
     For some background info into the mechanical linkage, see ....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaucellier%E2%80%93Lipkin_linkage and
    some mathematical info on the study of Chaos theory see http://theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-chaos-theory-10620 that being a general
     'soft introduction thus easy' description of Chaos  theory  &  please  see  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamical_billiards to  which  the 
    mention of a Circle's chaos properties are referring ,  a billiard ball being '   the Circle '  here.    A  little  bit tougher  to   'chew'   though   { : (

      An even deeper historical "suspected mathematical"  link exists but we keep that one on ice for now due to its unsavory  nature  relating 
       to 'recent' years past activities on the world stage, thus not to stoke ( as yet ) some, well founded legitimate resentments as anticipated ;- 

- that is before mathematical clarity prevail.

         Not to worry that you may be kept in the ' unknown ' though, it will be 'reluctantly' served up later when the matter becomes completely    

  'geometry wise' unavoidable.

4

     Well ...what then is this so-called 'Overlooked' and 'Left undiscovered' Relationship between a Circle and a Square ?

    and the Twine Waves on the Far Right  ( Done with a CAD Program ) are called : ...................SUPER TWINES  .....on account of their flowing form being so pleasing to the eye.

5

( I nearly forgot to mention that  these Variation in Wave shapes are made by Simply changing the Distance between the Pivot and the Square 
Once for each complete 360 rotation only 
( Not a pulsed / dynamic Changing ;- that's  for later ) and also for the Elastic set of Twines the Trace Circle rotate Counter to 
the Big Crank circle...... 
Don't  worry all will be made clear in a very Graphic manner later.  No differentiation is made in these Twine Name  
Descriptions of  which twine  belong to the Elastic / Unstable set  and  which belong to the Realistic / Stable set ........
This being just an intro into the "weird" or "Chaotic looking"  wave shapes that is hidden in this very basic Circle - Square Relationship. )   

6

So what do these above "Wavy Shapes" have that require our attention ? 

Before that answer is attempted,  see below some even "Stranger" Twine  Waves 

and note that these Twin wave shapes are NOT just Random "Wavy" Shapes Subtracted from each other 

that then can give a Midway Sine Wave as a Resultant though we do not really need to pursue the Sine wave form here. 

The TWINE Waves themselves,  are VERY specific Wave shapes  that are NOT at all derived from

Fourier Transforms , but from a Unique Formula that Mathematically Describe This Particular Circle + Square Relationship, 

we may as well call it the EB- Formula.

 ( This Formula will be given Graphically and in  a Basic Program Form Later in this Writing )  

So here is then those promised more Twine Waves Shapes. 

These Twines below is called 

:  SLURP Twines

These Twines below is called  

:  SHARD  Twines

These Twines below is called  

:  SLUMP Twines 

These Twines below is called 

:  STUMP Twines (see if you can Spot the difference from SLUMP Twines )

These Twines below is called  

STEEP Twines 

7

Yes there are other variants and these Shapes are from Two Families of Twine and yes you can discover them all 

when you run the EB- Program that will be later made available ( Free of course ) for download. 

Now However let there be an attempt to answer that Question posted above :-

So what does these above "Wavy Shapes" have that require our attention ? 

8

 

At the risk of being mind numbing

( considering that one person  described the previous Website as   " pages of  gibberish about some supposedly new function that has deep meanings" ) 

GibberishAnswerTxt.html

here then is the "Proper" Word description of  what 'Twin waves' is

( for those who did find the Previous Web site fascinating as was also indicated by e-mail ) 

may this ( mid year 2012)  website then be more clear , I hope .......

01) “TWINE WAVES” refer to 2 Sets of Waves of Complex Variable Shapes each.

02) One Set called Stable=Realistic Twines

03) and the other Set called Unstable=Elastic Twines.

  1.  

04) They are generated Geometrically as Double waves in each Set

05) and are 'related' to the Sine wave fundamental by means of a Fourier Subtraction result.

06) These Double or Twin Waves are created by the Dynamiclinking of a Circleand a Square.

  1.  

07) The Twin waves in all cases are at 1/24th phase difference within each set of Twines. ( Interesting since Prime Numbers and the Integer 24 seem to Like each Other a Lot !

See (  http://primes.utm.edu/curios/page.php/24.html )

08) One of the Twin waves is a Mirror and a Flipped version of the other Wave.

  1.  

09) A single Formula drive the creation of each Twine couple

  1.  

So the Fourier Subtraction Resultant of the Twin Waves always is a Perfect Sine Wave though the Complex Twin waves Shapes 

themselves are not derived from a Fourier process, rather being the result of a unique single Formula.

The Dynamic Linking of the Circle & Square has been shown above Graphically but lets continue with some Postulate as to why these 

Mathematical /Geometrical Twine waves should be considered important enough to deserve your further attention even though some has a random look about them.

Let's make a big jump here from Geometry to Physics considering that we all accept that the universe do operate on Mathematical Principles, some known but a “lot” still undiscovered.

 

9

 

Postulate ONE

( i )

Knowing then that all particles Vibrate:- Twine Wave Variable Shapes are proposed as the real motion track of such Particle 

behavior instead of the Sine Wave track we so far assumed for Particle motion.

Yes it is suggested as real particle X – Y coordinate motion,not probability of position stuff here.

( ii ) 

Added to this audacious proposal is another thought ;- that most particles in their natural state 'prefer' to move 

in this “Sine resultant “ balanced relationship in a paired state, thus Closely Doubled !.

{ The above postulate so far is really two distinct thoughts but since the subject is about twinning.....! }

( iii ) 

Therefore in such a Twin relationship each Particle Couple will try to remain, unless violently torn apart such as in an atomic 

smashing situation after which the now single particles will behave with Soliton { see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton } wave 

properties till they come together again as they will tend to or find other mates to reform Twine Wave Couples.

( iv ) 

This may begin to explain the detection it seems in recent years of particle correlations in atom smashers, that is,

an 'inclination to move together' on the part of some particles.

I speculate that more of this may become apparent in the particle detection process as the sensitivity of those 

sophisticated machines and of course the insight-fullness of the learned ones advance.

( v ) 

{ For some background info see .....http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=107440

and also try , try very hard please, to read this..........http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access? contribId=7&sessionId=1&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=140054

( vi ) 

Yes I know it is tough as old nails but the gist of it is that there has been observed in both a USA based accelerator 

1st in their copper - ion smashing experiments circa (before or during) 2010 'ish and  later in proton collision experiments at Cern sometime during 2011,

that some particle collision aftermath results seem to move in a similar direction / manner ;- hence the description Angular Correlation are used to 

begin to describe that “new” line of 'smashed' particle behavior investigation.

( vii ) 

See Word Definition :  Correlation = : http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/correlation 

See definition 3 = Statistics =  the degree to which two or more attributes or measurements on the same group of elements show a tendency to vary together. ( Definitions @ the Dictionary.com link = thnx 

( viii )

 ( See some  musings here in the link  below { the first 40 plus pages are named : iam or gates theory } as to why this 'Correlation' stuff  matters

in this raw and unfinished work  I  intend to name  :  ON MOTION AND MORE  if ever I do complete it.) 

 https://junkyardinnovations.info/iam=ImaginaryAtomicModel-or-gates_theory(AN-UNFINISHED-WORK).pdf   

and below 

( ix )

https://junkyardinnovations.info/EB_EXE%27s+basSOURCE-files%20(%20THIS%20IS%20THE%20IMPORTANT%20STUFF_SCAN%20IT%20BEFORE%20USE%20).zip

is some  EB Programs ( Still the Basic Stuff - Later the more Advanced one will be published ) 

with the  EB Core Calculation Code Block  separated 

and also see a poem;-

 Twine Sine Song  

that summarizes some theoretical thoughts

as to why this 

Twin Wave stuff may 

be useful.  

 Also See 

Copy Right Waiver and EBSimplexleg 

 Postulate ONE Conclude.

Now on to Number Two...

Postulate no. 2

( i )
 
Just a Suggestion for the more Mathematically adept out there....
 
 (  If   only I  could do it myself ....) 
 
So what is the suggestion.....
 
It is the idea of 
using the Geometric Elements of the whole 
EB Pendulum , yes the Square + Circle  + 2 Extension Lines 
as a mathematical model for the 4 forces our Universe seems to be made of.
Yes Audacious as it seems ( becoming  a habit now ...) to use a simple Square &  Circle 
and 2 Extension lines  instead of complex String Theory Maths. 
How do I propose this to work....or should be attempted ? 
 
 
( ii )
 
Well , the 
Strong force could be the Square,
with the 
Weak Interaction being the Trace Circle,
leaving then
Electromagnetism as the Main Crank Circle
and last but not least then
Gravity being obviously the Extension Lines with 
more specifically the interesting closed curve at the Extension endpoint with it's area 
properties  being taken into the calculation.
 
 
( iii )
 
Naturally the goal would be to figure out some 
RATIO 
among these Geometric elements
that correspond  to the reality 
and  you are really not at all bound to assign these qualities to the 
Geometry as suggested above.
 
 
( iv )
 
Mix and match as you will 
but take note that 
two of these , 
one being the Weak Interaction 
( involved in radioactive decay / nuclear fusion ) 
are  highly suggestive of the 
Trace Circle 
since a Reverse in it's Rotation direction 
in relation to the Main Circle Crank
do not "break"  the EB Twin wave system 
but rather produce a New set of Strange looking Twin Waves 
as apposed to when both Trace and Main Crank Rotate in the same direction.
Also note that that the Trace Circle is so named because it need not, indeed do not actually 
exist as a Physical Part of The EB pendulum if you were to construct it. 
The Trace Circle is really as named,  a Trace of Projection Lines from the Square Circle Relationship as it moves.
Mathematically  Calculating  the  Trace Circle is critical for the EB formula to be derived.
However it can easily be used to indicate an "unstable" aspect of the EB = "ATOM"  by simply 
Reversing it mathematically and yet maintaining Twin wave Qualities.
 
 
 
( v )
 
The  second  Element  to  take  Note of  is  
the  Extension  lines 
which I  'strongly'  suggest should be made to resemble Gravity in your Calculations to get to those 
Elusive Ratios Between the Forces,
the why of it being this:-
Since you can Extend the Extensions Mathematically as long as you wish , yes even beyond  the Most 
Distant Galaxy you can think of, it does make sense to assign  that geometric element to Gravity for the obvious reason that 
distance really is thoroughly bound up with it, Gravity acting over way much more longer distances as compared to the other 3 Forces.
 
 
 
( vi )
 
Yes that would leave the Square & the Main Crank Circle to  
Mathematically  'play / switch forces'  about......
That's if  you follow my suggestion.
  AND 
of course do make use of the
 EB Core Calculation Code Block 
Somewhere in your effort
Anyway  that's  my say....Please Surprise me if you can.....
 
( vii ) 
ALSO  I tag on to this Postulate No.2 the Idea of Cold Light
( Such as produced by Fire flies )  
been One Shape of Twine ( Perhaps SUPER twine SHAPE ) while Heat carrying is accomplished 
by another Shape of Twine Wave ( Maybe SHARP / SHARD twine ) even though the Frequency thus Color, if in the visible spectrum, 
of both light sources may be the exactly  the same. This goes for the invisible spectrum as well. 
IF so then we can apply such in Really Cool Computer Screens and also Heat Panels as need be 
with much fine control to name just one application of such a Twine wave understanding. 
Those who wishes to communicate  "private information"  while using a well monitored frequency, also need to take note.

 Postulate TWO Conclude.

Now on to Number THREE...

  

 

  

 

 Postulate no. 3

 

( i )


This relate to Protein forming regarding to the as yet  Mysterious  reason as to why 
a Particular String of  Amino Acids  would Always fold the same way 
while it really Could have folded into Many other Possible 3D Combinations.
It is like Dropping a Long String with a lot of  Knots in it and that string always , 
but always fall  in a Heap of 3D string that is always 
3D Shaped exactly the same, yes every time for that Particular Combination 
of String Length / Knot Type.

( ii )

First read this please:-

http://phys.org/news/2012-08-mystery-protein-nobel-laureate-insights.html

( iii )

By the way ...It does seem that

some ( other )  Websites on Protein Folding seems to glance over the fact that the  
Folding of Proteins Exact reasons and mechanisms, are still largely undiscovered as at 
this date of   8th of  November 2013.

( iv )

 
These Websites ( which will remain unnamed ) make generalized and vague statements on this topic , 
based on unproven theoretical / assumptions,
( Reminding  me not to State My Own Theories as fact. )
on this 'How do Proteins Fold to their Final Shape' topic, 
thus offering no clue to the uninformed reader that the Mystery  of Protein Folding 
even exist and still remain largely unsolved.

( v )


Not everyone do glance over this important topic though. 
In this regard  I do note that there are those sites that make it abundantly clear that they 
as yet are making a theoretical Statement or tentative experiment and observations that seem to 
lean in the direction of a particular Theory.

( vi ) 

 


For instance See here:-


http://phys.org/news76329515.html#nRlv

   
Please take note of this quote from... 
http://phys.org/news/2012-08-mystery-protein-nobel-laureate-insights.html


"A polypeptide chain [ a more precise word for Protein ]

could spend more time than the age of the universe “trying” all of its possible conformers 

to find its native one.   In reality, folding never takes more than a few seconds. "

( Read the article to see the context please...) 


Now compare the above  clear statement from a Nobel laureate summation ;-

to this 2ND quote. 


( Once again, I won't mention this website directly )
 
"The final shape adopted by a newly synthesized protein is typically the 
most energetically favorable one.
As proteins fold, they test a variety of conformations before 
reaching their final form, which is unique and compact."


Now while it may actually be  correct 

( If one day finally Confirmed / Proven to be so ) 

this above quotation from the 2ND Webpage's article on that particular page 

and at that time of my reading it ( also 8 Nov 2013 ) 
do make this statement

in a context, according

 
to my " limited " insights, that may give 


the impression that there

Is

a full understanding of 


how / why Proteins fold in their particular 3D configurations,

 
thus COMPLETELY obscuring the

 
fact that this process is really still a mystery if one read only that article on the subject.

 

( vi i ) 

 My disagreement with this 2ND Websites statement is summed up in this here below's reasoning.....

 
If a Protein chain ( before folding ) were to

"test" all conformations 
( taking not the time equivalent to the age of the universe to test ALL Possibilities ) 
but taking ' no more than a few seconds ' before getting to 
"the most energetically favorable one" then it seems that somewhere in the Timeline 
 

a Amino acid Chain in the process of becoming a Protein

Do " Decide " on 
 

A form WITHOUT  TESTING ALL Possible Shapes 
 

( IT JUST DO NOT HAVE THE TIME ! )

and whether it is the " most favorable energetically expression of form " 
cannot be determined ( with our current knowledge ) from our human viewpoint since we 
just do not see how it, the Polypeptide chain,
could have tested  all possibilities of Chain configurations, even though the particular Protein 
Chain seems to "know" what form it must be

long before All possibilities were tested. 


( To say the same thing in a Double manner for emphasis ) 

( viii ) 

  
Perhaps these reasoning's above begin to Un-Obscure the issue for you if there was such a need.

     
However before moving on to my speculated connection between Twine waves and Protein forming,
I need to take one more stab at those who Obscure.

( ix )  
My problem is with statements that give the impression 

( I will not quote any websites directly here... )

that the Amino Acid Side Chains do the driving of the Protein final shape to a large degree

and there the idea is left without further clarification.

 


Now once again while that may one day prove to be true,\

the issue here is that we as yet 


do not fully know of the mechanism 


( unless you can inform me otherwise, besides the theoretical proposals ) 


that drive those Side groups into a particular Snap 3D Form 'Vibration' Configuration .

( x )  

To see my issue with such above mentioned statements, let's do some reasoning like the following....


For instance let's call the First Side Chain of a "Small" Protein with 
only 100 Amino Acids ( in whatever ) sequence, the no.1 Side Chain.

 Now the issue arise :- How do no.1 Know what sort of alignment / "final" position 
it need to have in relation to for instance no.80 Side chain.
 
This Question is valid and not to be obscured since we as yet do not 
with our 'fine' instruments detect some sort of Force emanating from no.1 Side Chain
that Play beyond it's immediate neighborhood of Molecular Bonding Forces so as to reach across
ALL of the Side chains ( the other Side chains then doing same ) and thus 'Broadcast' their respective
positions to each other WHILE THE POLYPEPTIDE CHAIN IS STILL ( briefly ) 

IN IT'S UNFOLDED FORM.

( Yes just a Linear string of amino acids , each with it's various side chains = 

It helps to visualize it as a TV Arial with side spokes emanating from it's Main Axis ).   

( xi )  
      
The Mechanism or Process ( at a lack of  better expressions )  that does the Pulling / Folding, together into the Various alignments, 
thus remain Unseen / Undiscovered / Largely Unproven,   as at this date of  8  November 2013.


Yes one must allow for the idea that one Side chain will have an influence on it's Immediate neighbors
on the Linear ( Flat ) Amino Acid side chain however
that in itself does not suggest some sort of Detectable 
Domino Falling, Shaping Force at play among the Side Chains  that drags / KNITS  the rest  ( the all of  )  the Amino acid's Side chain
into an Alignment that is Specific for that particular Amino Acid/Side Chain Sequence.


Thus from the viewpoint of our Limited insights, that Amino Acid/Side Chain Sequence Could have
easily have clumped into any random shaped clump within the mathematical combination "limitations"
which of course can be quit a lot of combinations for this 100 member long Amino Acid Chain.
Of course One of them would be the useful Protein if all combinations be tried. 

( xii )

 


And just a thought for those who firmly believe that all Biological life forms as we know is one giant 
fortuitous but accidental coming together of molecules, this thought :- 


If just one critical Protein or maybe a few of them Chains were 
still busy trying their Optimal 3D configurations

( Taking longer than the age of the Universe you remember ) 

then that would make life

( Any life based on Proteins = and I do not Know of any that is not ), 

pretty much impossible.

 
Only a willingness to Ignore mathematical fact can see a mind Past that point of Impossibility,  yes if one were 

more inclined to stick to a believe that  the complexity of  the multitude of  lifeforms,   

are due to  a tumbling together of things  under the  " leading's "   of  blind chance. 

 

( xiii )


Well Clearly we see that those Amino Acids are being 3D Stitched together by means of  a  as  yet 
unknown Choosing / Shaping Law, into their Functional Shapes, that we as yet cannot put our collective finger on.

( IT IS NOT JUST THE SIDE CHAINS IT SEEMS. MORE IS REQUIRED.)         

( xiv )

So why does it matter that we should  want to know the exactitude of this Mysterious Protein Folding Process ?

At the risk of stating the obvious let see in a very limited way, what we can benefit if we could figure out how a Protein 

would look in i'ts 3 D form if  we could model it from an Amino Acid sequence only.

 Check out the Website mentioned below ( again please ) to see there  a reference to a diseases that involve

a 'wrongly' folded  Protein.  

Now what could we do if we take our know how  of  how it should have been folded  

and

Combine  it  with the Still Elusive Foundation Knowledge How to Fold Proteins.....need I go on ?  

 See a quote below from  the Website mentioned above....


  " It is still impossible to predict from the  how the corresponding protein will fold.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-08-mystery-protein-nobel-laureate-insights.html#jCp "

 

( xv ) 

Naturally it is not only Medicine that would benefit since to name just a few not too radical thoughts....

What about artificially making Wood products that cannot be differentiated from the trees being cut down today in their vast numbers.

Or artificially making Beef ( or what ever else ) Protein

without using the roundabout "test tube"  methods Scientist are attempting  today to grow 

food ,  hamburgers it seems,   

in the lab involving tricky Gene manipulations, 

because one would be able to

WORK TOWARDS  

constructing any

'edible' ( or not )  Protein from the foundation up so to speak.....

IF ONLY WE KNOW HOW COME THEY FOLD THE  WAY  THEY DO.

Need I go on....?

No not really, I will leave the rest to your own imagination.

 

( xvi ) 

SO NOW WE RETURN TO THE TWINE OF THINGS...

( Yes Unproven to exist in nature as yet .... but Mathematically / Geometrically VERY MUCH real ) 


The Speculative Idea "Connecting"  Twine waves  Specific & Uniquely Shaped Wave forms,   
here with Protein forming
is rather  'Simple' ,  
this being it.....

 

 
 

( LATER = Got to go now ........25th  of  November  2013.) 

Please use this below email address for Contact : 

m@junkyardinnovations.com

or 

m.junkyardinnovations@gmail.com

or 

m___@mail.com

GIBBERISHANSWERTXT : SEE BELOW 
 

0
"pages of gibberish about some supposedly new function that has deep meanings"
1

 Notes from m___ 'some' relating to this one comment above :-

2
 In the Desire or Need to Express an Opinion it is not always possible to match the Time needed to inform oneself 
 so as to come to a well weighted, with factual scientific insightful, conclusion, on the part of some.

 
3
  Making a sweeping statement which is expected, towards the Theoretical musings/ speculations,
 WITHOUT  EXCLUDING 
the simple  easy to prove for oneself Geometry / Maths,
 suggest a lack of time at the least, since one would not want 
to ascribe anything 
   else 
as to the reason for making such a remark, considering that the motive of the source individual is not clearly known.
   However, Thanks is due for steering some, appreciative, traffic to that previous website, from even this negative comment 
   as I discerned from e-mail. 
 
4
 Hence this new Twin wave website's attempt to make the info so easy to grasp for the benefit of even the 
 briefest of perusal though this may be difficult if not impossible to achieve for all minds given the 
 shortness of the attention span in this information glutted age.
 { toooo  looong ?!!! } 

 To which glut I gladly add  of course !
 
5

 In addition some 'history':-

6
 The reason for re-doing this site mostly relate to the restrictive nature of the previous host.  
 This new host allow more options.
 I trust that those who found the previous site fascinating, will get it, that simplifying things will not 
 mean losing the "deep meanings"  of the stuff previously given.
 
7

 An observation :-

8
 I am delighted to see that some are using the Twin wave EB- Calculations Graphics on their various sites 
 even on tmblr.
 
 9
 That Fine;- it's  yours to use as you please, - though my preference do lean towards Mathematics instruction 
 as I  also saw on a  Math's teacher's Website 
( Displaying EB-Geometry 'Pythagoras Applied' Calculations )
 since the, simple easy to check, Geometry can benefit us with  
 more Calculus insights one day when some 
Mathematics genius show us 
how  to really apply  it 
even   beyond  my 
speculations.
 
 10
 Perhaps some at the Universities / Colleges & Electronic companies, who has been recorded on my visitors
 log, are already using the EB-formula to explore  possibilities like additional data carrying capacity 
 within the now somewhat glutted Cell phone channel frequency spectrum, 
which could be just one application 
 even if the Twin waves idea itself 
MAY 
prove to be non-existent,
( .....in spite of things like "quantum entanglement" to which it suggest deeper insights etc..... ) 
the EB maths can still be applied  
to such venture's in 
an emulation mode. 

 If only they could reveal some of their direction of thought, yet I realize they have to play it 
 close to the chest....
 Patent's and Claims...I know 
 Not of course due to any worry that I may claim since I already renounced such.

  The Eb stuff is really free  : )        
 
11

 And then this unsavory stuff :-

 12
 My only concern is that at least in two instances, serious attempts was made to link 
this Mathematical Geometry
 Twin wave stuff to 'fringe science' unverifiable mystic ideas, 
an act which
 I GREATLY DISCOURAGE 
but of course 

 I am not able to stop such mention of Twin waves on those 
mystic sites as these ones seek some sort of "prove" for their ideas.

 
13
 The TOTALLY THEORETICAL / SPECULATIVE  idea
 that more data may be carried / 'hidden'  in the electromagnetic frequencies as suggested 
 by the EB-Twin wave  variable wave structures....as opposed to the assumed 'up to now ' sine wave form...

 unfortunately
 ( as anticipated )

do draw the attention of the mystics.  

  To Restate : 
Twin waves even though being 
A Mathematical / Geometric Reality, is 
NOT "yet" PROVEN AS EXISTING OUTSIDE OF 

   THE MATHEMATICAL / GEOMETRY FRAMEWORK.
And I anticipate then that even IF one day Proven to exist, 
Twine waves  will never , ever  prove to be a Bases for concluding 
about stuff  that belong to the Complexity of HUMAN FREE WILL 
since such free will I Believe, CANNOT be made subject to 'Simplistic' patterns of a Mechanical Kind.
Even Twin waves conceptually in it's GEOMETRICAL Complexity of Wave forms 
must prove to be Very, VERY  much INFERIOR to the COMPLEXITY OF THE HUMAN MIND.
 
 14

 The 'gibberish' comment above was drawn from someone that saw such a link from a 'mystic' to my site. 
       
        15       
 The sober reality it seems is that the company 
that
 KEEPS YOU, 
even uninvited, 
due to the nature of the internet, 

 influence the forming of opinion on the part of some.
 
16 

 Optimistically though :

 I do note that most readers of my site are of such nature that they
seem to have more stamina for  the scientific, 
that include theoretical physics 
( which indeed is "gibberish" to most "sane" people) 
and of course  easily verifiable
 geometry/mathematics and are able to see past that sort of
 'mystic attachment attempts'.

    

 Thanks for noting that just because some "flies" are gathering around does not mean that the object of attention 
 is rotten, it might actually be some desirable piece of fresh cake ! 'Swat' the "flies" away and see for yourself ! 
 
17

 A request :-

18

 Please enlighten me if you are inclined to such kindness,
 as to your thoughts about
 the "Newness" of this 
 Circle connected with a Square Geometry 
other than the Puaecellier-Lipkin linkage which was already commented on by a 

 Professor of Mathematics Specializing in Geometry 
who at that time initially thought that the EB Linkage was the same thing.
 
19

  It is actually using the same Number of Links 
but with only the Pivot being in a different place 
causing the EB to be a 

   True Curve generator 
( as opposed to an ARCH generator )
  on it's Extensions while the Pauecillier-Lipkin Linkage is meant 
   for generating straight lines.  
 
20

 Other learned one's such as a Doctor in Statistics, 
a Maths Student and his Mathematics Lecturer at a well known 

 University,
 also indicated upon being explained / shown this EB stuff in person, that they never had come across 
 something like this in their studies. 
 
21
So therefore my "tentative" claim to "Newness"
 added to my own scrounging around 
 from about 1986 till now (year 2012) to search out something like this EB- Twin wave Mathematics.
  
   22    
 All I could "come" up with is a 'suspicion' ( No real proof that is ) that this simple Circle + Square Relationship 
 principles  might have been discovered a few thousand years ago in what is called the Middle East today
( a historical  source of Mathematical insights we all know ).
 
23
 This statement  above is based not on actually uncovering any direct Math's
 but only a Historical symbol originating from that region which 

 I "recognized" as being exactly CORRESPONDING to the 
essential 'Geometry / actually Trigonometry' of the Eb - Calculations 
 coordinate Maths. You will spot this Symbol when you check out the Trace Circle Geometry. 

 In addition, there is the possibility that someone in  Europe at the later part of the 16 hundred's could have made used
 of the 1/24th out of phase principle that is 'Hard-wired' in this Circle Square relationship but unfortunately the Maths of 
 that work remain 'lost'  to us till today it seems. This last possibility of Prior discovery, remain then even more Un-provable 
 than the Middle Eastern connection.
 

 Nevertheless I remain open to the idea
 that this stuff might have been discovered before,
considering the fact that after  thousands of years of Geometry efforts that took place,
how would it be possible for this Simple but Fascinating 

24

1/24th Out  of Phase relationship 
between  the
 Elementary Circle
 and the 
Common Square,
 to 

go 

Unnoticed ?

 Hardly likely , I 'feel'!

25

 However since "suspicious feelings based on very flimsy similarities" is not proof, I do present it as "New" at least for our Generation Today.

26

 You are of course asked to indicate whether you indeed did see such "EB like" stuff, 
elsewhere, before and correct my perspective on 

 things. 
That would be 
much appreciated and 
any acknowledgement will be given
upon such proof provided.
 
( A previous claim that this Twin wave stuff was thought of  about 70+ years ago was unfortunately not backed up with any record of 
Mathematics nor did that  70+ year old Idea itself directly match,  that is Geometrically correspond to EB - Geometry ....So please be thorough ! ) 
 
27
 
In Conclusion 
"Phew !!"
may I 'steal '/ repeat this saying 
( I think somebody said this before ...) :- 
 
 28
 
"DO NOT MEASURE THE MAN ;- MEASURE THE MATH."
 
29

 Any thoughts to :- 
 
30
 
 m.junkyardinnovations@gmail.com  
 
31

 

 


 Thnx from m___